Main mistakes Israel made in its recent campaign against Iran:
⚠️ Major Missteps by Israel
1. Backfired Strategy of “Decapitation & Regime Change”
Israel assumed that killing top officials and bombing symbolic targets would trigger internal rebellion.
Instead, it strengthened Iranian nationalism, uniting critics, activists, and hardliners alike theguardian.com+15aljazeera.com+15wanaen.com+15theguardian.com+15ft.com+15moderndiplomacy.eu+15.
2. Underestimating Iran’s Response & Defense Capabilities
-
Missile Interceptions & Drone Losses: Iran downed Israeli F‑35s and drones on days two and three, revealing flaws in Israel’s belief they could neutralize opposition swiftly moderndiplomacy.eu.
-
Anti-missile Overreliance: Iran’s missile salvos penetrated Israel’s air defenses, which lacked sufficient interceptor stockpiles—Drains on Iron Dome and Arrow systems became evident theguardian.com.
3. Misjudging the Nuclear Program’s Resilience
Despite targeting Fordow and Natanz, Iran likely relocated material underground, enabling the nuclear program to survive and rebound theguardian.com+15aljazeera.com+15ft.com+15.
4. Diplomatic & Legal Fallout
-
Global Condemnation: The strikes violated international law and fractured Israel’s diplomatic relations, even among allies wsj.com+15washingtonpost.com+15apnews.com+15.
-
Political Bleedover: The campaign further damaged Israel’s already tarnished reputation and undermined any global sympathy post-Gaza theguardian.com+1wsj.com+1.
5. Exceeding National Limits
-
Large-Scale Strikes vs Limits: Massive military actions risked escalating into a protracted war, which Israel—small in size and population—was ill-equipped to sustain theguardian.com+8moderndiplomacy.eu+8de.wikipedia.org+8.
-
Civilian Vulnerability: With 90% of its population clustered in under 10% of territory, deep-strikes exposed large swathes to retaliation, risking significant civilian harm moderndiplomacy.eu.
✅ Summary Table
Mistake | Effect |
---|---|
Decapitation strategy | Bolstered Iranian nationalism—unity, not dissent |
Underestimating Iran’s defense | ISR losses & missile breaches |
Nuclear resilience misjudged | Campaign didn't eliminate nuclear capacity |
Legal/diplomatic missteps | International backlash, harmed credibility |
Strategic overreach | Heightened escalation risk & domestic vulnerability |
🔍 Bottom Line
Israel’s precision and tactical planning were mitigated by strategic miscalculations. While it landed targeted blows to Iran’s military and nuclear sites, the campaign failed to erode Iran’s internal cohesion, exposed Israel’s defensive limitations, and sparked global criticism—potentially diminishing the long-term value of its military gains.
Comments
Post a Comment